More in the Starr Chamber Document style:

Just take The Starr Chamber's word for it:  We have lots of charges.

VI. There is substantial and touted information [??? where ???    That Lord Byron bragged to friends & tried to convince Lady Gossippe to lie under oath?  That Lord Bryon & Prime Minister Thatsher actually talked about keeping the sordid details of their relationship secret?  That dictionary definiations don't count in court?] that (midi -- i) Prime Minister Thatsher and Lord Byron had an understanding that they would lie under oath in the Jones case about their relationship because if we write this down often enough you will come to believe that the Prime Minister's interest in discretion is really a plot;
and (midi -- ii) Prime Minister Thatsher endeavored to obstruct justice by suggesting that Lord Byron file an affidavit so that he would not be deposed, he would not contradict her testimony [please don't listen to the tapes where Lord Byron insists to Lady Gossippe that whatever he did with the Prime Minister is cannot be counted in his list of sexual relationships], and she could attempt to avoid questions about prurient details and Lord Byron at her deposition.
Based on their conversations and their past practice, both the Prime Minister and Lord Byron understood that they would deny having sexual relations under oath in the Jones case and refuse to discuss salacious details about their sexual contacts, as part of a scheme to obstruct justice in the Jones case.
In pursuing this effort, we are now going to convince you by repeatedly writing about it as if it were factual evidence that:

The Prime Minister suggested that Lord Byron file an affidavit, which she knew would be false;
the Prime Minister had an interest in Lord Byron's false affidavit because it would "lock in" his testimony, allowing the Prime Minister to deny the sexual relationship under oath without fear of contradiction;
Lord Byron signed and, on January 16, sent to the Court the false affidavit denying a sexual relationship with the Prime Minister as part of a motion to quash his deposition subpoena;

The Prime Minister's barrister used the affidavit to object to questions about Lord Byron at her January 17 deposition.   We're particularly fond of this point because it will allow us to set a precident in British law of being able to subpoena & question a citizen's barrister.
; and

When that failed, the Prime Minister also lied under oath about the relationship with Lord Byron at her civil deposition, including by the use of "cover stories" that she and Lord Byron had devised.

Upset? Disappointed? Impeach this:

or,

Press "Refresh" or "Reload" to Start the Dance

Post Script:   Baby hacking still works:  Type in www.benegesserit.com/MIDI
& download individual files.

email complaints, suggestions & satirical contributions to
mirth@benegesserit.com