lied under oath or used a dictionary definition about sex at a civil deposition
while she was a defendant in a sexual harassment lawsuit;
lied under oath or used that same dictionary definition about sex to a Starr
Chamber;
attempted to unsuccessfully to maintain faith in the discretion of a potential
witness who had direct knowledge of possible sexual details that would reveal the
circumspection of her deposition testimony designed to hide illicit and prurient details;
attempted to obstruct justice by not ordering a witness to never ever under any
circumstances think any more about his expressed thought of possibly only partially
complying with a subpoena in order to obfuscate said sexual details;
attempted to obstruct justice by encouraging a witness to file an affidavit that
the Prime Minister might have guessed would be misleading and would further conceal sexual
details, and then by making use of that misleading affidavit at her own deposition;
lied to potential Starr Chamber witnesses about sex or once again resorted to
that dictionary definition, possibly knowing that they would repeat those lies before the
Starr Chamber;
and engaged in a pattern of conduct, i.e. lying about sex or obstructing us by
using a dictionary definition, that was inconsistent with her constitutional duty to
faithfully execute the laws to reveal all to all of the people all of the time nd to give
The Starr Chamber more to work with.
